Friday, July 25, 2014

The Pleroma (4) - Charles H. Welch




















No.4. The Temporary Nature of 
the Present Heaven and Earth. 


“The things which are seen are temporal” (II Cor. iv. 18). 

“For by Him were all things created that are in heaven and that are in earth, visible and invisible” (Col. i. 16). 

“And the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters, and God said, Let there be light; and there was light” (Gen. i. 2 3). 

With the words of Genesis the first movement toward the goal of the ages is recorded. That it indicates a regenerative, redemptive movement is made clear by the allegorical use that Paul makes of it when writing to the Corinthians. 

“For God, Who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ” (II Cor. iv. 6). 

When we come to consider the place that Israel occupies in the outworking of the purpose of the ages, we shall find that there will be repeated in their case these allegorical fulfillments of Gen. i. 2, 3. 

“And He will destroy in this mountain the face of the covering cast over all people, and the veil that is spread over all nations” (Isa. xxv. 7). 

The “veil” plays a big part in the imagery of II Cor. iii. and iv. Like the rising light in Gen. i. 3, Israel’s light shall dispel the gross darkness that has engulfed the nations (Isa. lx. 1, 2), and both in this passage, in II Cor. iv. 6, and Isa. xi. 9 “The earth shall be full of the knowledge of the Lord, as the waters cover the sea”, it is evident that that “light” symbolizes knowledge, and prepares us to find in the midst of the garden not only the tree of life, but the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. These matters, however, are anticipatory of future studies, and the parallel of Israel with the six days’ creation will be better seen when we reach the Scriptures that speak of their call and destiny. In the present study we must confine ourselves to the consideration of the fact that here, in calling into existence the creation of the six days, we meet the first of a series of “fullnesses” that carry the purpose of the age on to their glorious goal. When we traverse the gap formed by the entry of sin and death, and reach in the book of the Revelation, the other extreme of this present creation, we find that, instead of natural light as in Gen. i. 3, “The Lamb is the light thereof”, “The Lord God giveth them light”, and we read further that the heavenly city “had no need of the sun, neither of the moon”. Instead of the stars which are spoken of in Gen. i. 16, we have the Lord holding “the seven stars in His right hand”, and He himself set forth as “the bright and morning Star”. These are indications that “the former things” are about to pass away. Perhaps the most suggestive item in the six days’ creation, apart from man who was made in the image of God, is the provision of the “firmament”. 

“And God said, Let there be a firmament in the midst of the waters, and let it divide the waters from the waters . . . . . and God called the firmament Heaven” (Gen. i. 6-8). 

The first fact that emerges from this passage, whatever for the moment the word “firmament” may prove to mean, is that this firmament that was “called” heaven must be distinguished from that one which was created “in the beginning”. Here is something peculiar to the present temporary creation, and destined to pass away at the time of the end. The margin of the A.V. draws attention to the fact that the Hebrew word raqia translated “firmament” means literally an “expansion”. Raqa, the verb is used by Jeremiah to speak of “silver spread into plates” (Jer. x. 9). Job speaks of Him “which alone spreadeth out the heavens” (Job ix. 8), and who “stretcheth out the north over the empty place” (tohu, ‘without form’ of Gen. i. 2) (Job xxvi. 7). The stretched out heavens are likened to a tent or tabernacle.

“That stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in” (Isa. xl. 22). 

“He that created the heavens, and stretched them out” (Isa. xlii. 5). 

“That stretched forth the heavens alone” (Isa. xliv. 24; li. 13; Zech. xii. 1).

Not only is the firmament spoken of in language that reminds of the Tabernacle, there is a reference in Job that suggests that the earth too is looked upon as the ground upon which this tabernacle in the sky rests. 

“Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened?” (Job xxxviii. 6). 

At first sight there may not appear anything in this passage to link it with the Tabernacle, but when it known that the same word which is translated “foundations” is rendered “socket” fifty-three times, and that fifty-two of the occurrences refer to the sockets on which the Tabernacle rested in the wilderness, then the references in Job xxxviii. takes on a richer and deeper meaning. The firmament of Gen. i. 6 is a lesser and temporary heaven, destined to pass away when the ages come to an end. This firmament is not only the distant heaven of the sun, the moon or stars, it is also the place where birds can fly (Gen. i. 17). Consequently we can understand that when Christ ascended, He is said to have “passed through” the heavens dierchomai not “passed into” (Heb. iv. 14). In Heb. vii. 26 Christ is said to have been “made higher” than the heavens, while Ephesians declares that He ascended up “far above all heavens”, with the object that He might “fill all things” (Eph. iv. 10). Christ is said to have passed through the heavens, to have been made higher than the heavens and to have ascended up far above all heavens. Thus it is impossible for Him to be far above all heavens, and yet be at the same time seated in those very heavens if one and the same heaven is intended, for even though knowledge of heaven and heavenly things may be very limited, we can understand the simple import of the language used. Consequently when we discover that two words are employed for “heaven”, one is ouranos which includes the highest sphere of all, but nevertheless can be used of that heaven which is to pass away (Matt. v. 18), of the air where birds fly (Matt. vi. 26), the heaven of the stars (Matt. xxiv. 29) and of the angels (Mark xiii. 32). 

The other word is epouranios. We perceive that in many passages ouranos refers to the firmament of Gen. i. 6, while epouranios refers to the heaven of Gen. i. 1 which was unaffected by the overthrow of verse two, and will not be dissolved and pass away. This is where Christ now sits at the right hand of God “Far above all of the heavens”. Heb. ix. 24 speaks of this sphere as “heaven itself”. In two passages the heavens are said to be rolled together or to depart “as a scroll” (Isa. xxxiv. 4; Rev. vi. 14). The present heaven and earth is a temporary “tabernacle” (Psa. xix. 4) in which the God of creation can dwell as the God of Redemption. This creation is to be folded up as a garment (Heb. i. 11, 12), the firmament is likened to the curtains of a tabernacle, which will be “unstitched” at the time of the end (Job xiv. 12 LXX), and pass away as a scroll. The figure is one that appeals to the imagination. A scroll of parchment stretched out and suddenly released, is a figure employed to indicate the sudden departure of the “firmament”, “the stretched out heavens”. The word used in Rev. vi. 14 is apochorizomai, which occurs but once elsewhere, and speaks of a departure that followed a violent “paroxysm” or “contention” (Acts xv. 39). Chorizo which forms part of this word means “to put asunder” (Matt. xix. 6) and “separate” (Rom. viii. 35). Isa. xxxiv. 4 which speaks of the heavens being rolled together as a scroll, and so speaks of the “firmament” of Gen. i. 6, leads on to the repetition of the condition of Gen. i. 2, for in Isa. xxxiv. 11, as we have seen, “confusion” is tohu and “emptiness” is bohu, the two words translated “without form and void”. 

The position at which the record of the ages has now reached is as follows: 







Into the gap caused by the overthrow of Gen. i. 2 is placed the present creation which together with its temporary heaven is to pass away. This present creation, headed by man, constitutes the first of a series of “fullnesses” that follow a series of “gaps” until we at length arrive at Him, in Whom “all fullness dwells”. 

We read in Gen. i. 28 “Be fruitful and multiply and replenish the earth” where the word “replenish” is the verb male, a word which as a noun is translated “fullness” in such passages as “The earth is the Lord’s and the fullness thereof” (Psa. xxiv. 1). The Septuagint uses the verb pleroo to translate male in Gen. i. 28. 

Before we pass on to the next “gap” we must examine the Scriptures and endeavour to discover where the ages begin. In the above diagram it is suggested that the ages begin with the overthrow of Gen. i. 2 and end with the New Creation. This inquiry therefore, must be the subject of our next article. 

---------------


------------------

“The House of Jacob shall Possess their Possessions” (5)

by Charles H. Welch


No.5. The sending of the spies. 


The opening words of Numb. xiii. seem to teach that the sending of the spies by Moses was in harmony with the will of the Lord. 
  
“And the Lord spake unto Moses saying, Send thou men, that they may search the land of Canaan, which I give unto the children of Israel.” 

So also, the words of Christ to Thomas could be interpreted when He said “Thomas, reach hither thy finger”; nevertheless we know that it would have been more blessed had Thomas believed without such evidence. 

In chapter x. of the book of Numbers we read these words: 

“And they departed from the mount of the Lord three days journey: and the ark of the covenant of the Lord went before them in the three days journey, TO SEARCH OUT a resting place for them” (Numb. x. 33). 

Here we find the identical word used that is afterwards used of the spies. “That they may search the land”, “To spy out the land”. Altogether the Hebrew word tur occurs thirteen times in Numb. x. to xiv., an ominous number, associated in the Scriptures with rebellion. 

Notice what the spies were to include in their report, whether the land was ‘good or bad’, ‘fat or lean’. Surely if God Himself had chosen this land for their possession, and had described it as a land flowing with milk and honey, it hardly seems to be the exercise of faith or trust to send spies to see whether it be ‘fat or lean’! 

The ‘three days journey’ already mentioned seems to suggest that the Risen Christ has gone ahead, and is sufficient pledge concerning the nature of the inheritance that awaits His redeemed people. Moreover, when Moses rehearsed this matter before all Israel after the days of wandering had come to an end, the sending of the spies is put in a somewhat different light. 

“And I said unto you, ye are come unto the mountain of the Amorites, which the Lord our God doth give unto us. Behold, the Lord thy God hath set the land before thee: GO UP AND POSSESS IT, as the Lord God of thy fathers hath said unto thee; fear not, neither be discouraged” (Deut. i. 20, 21). 

Notice that the land had been GIVEN to Israel. Moses said to his father-in-law, “We are journeying unto the place of which the Lord said, I will GIVE it you” (Numb. x. 29). 

This was the basis of the argument of Caleb and Joshua, 

“The land which we passed through to search it, is an exceeding good land. If the Lord delight in us, then He will bring us into this land, and GIVE it us; a land which floweth with milk and honey” (xiv. 7, 8). 

The word ‘set’ used by Moses in Deut. i. 20, 21 is actually a repetition of the word ‘give’ as the margin indicates. God’s Gift, God’s Word, God’s Covenant promise, all were put to the question by the sending of the spies. 

“Ye came near unto Me every one of you” (Deut. i. 22). 

The same words are used in Deut. v. 23 where once again the people were moved by fear. This kind of ‘coming near’ has something unhealthy about it. It seems on a par with the attitude of those who would catch the Lord in His speech, and approach Him with honeyed words “Master, we know that Thou art true” etc. 

“We will send.” These words must be remembered when we read Numb. xiii. 2 “Send thou men”. Ezekiel makes it clear that when the Exodus took place, the Lord had Himself ESPIED the land for them, a land flowing with milk and honey, which is the glory of all lands (Ezek. xx. 5, 6). The spies were to bring word again ‘by what way we must go up’ but God had already told them. Even when the report had been made, Israel ‘rebelled against the commandment of the Lord’ (Deut. i. 26) and they charged God with ‘hating’ them, and in spite of all the faithful testimony of Caleb and Joshua and the added reminder of Moses, they ‘did not believe the Lord their God’ (Deut. i. 32). 

Quite a number of those who believe the teaching of the epistles of the Mystery have expressed themselves as unsatisfied by the scantiness of the revelation there contained as to (1) just what constitutes the glory of our inheritance, and (2) just exactly by what way the Church shall enter into its hope. There is a looking back to the hope of an earlier dispensation, a sort of envy at the lavish description of the millennial kingdom, or of the wonders of the Heavenly City, and one senses something petulant in the request, “Where is our hope described in the epistles of the Mystery? Why are there no details given to us as to others?” There is also a querulous complaint* that whereas I Thess. iv. or I Cor. xv. are most explicit, one cannot be sure from the prison epistles whether the Church of the One Body will be caught up by rapture, will die off and pass through death and resurrection, whether all will go together, whether there will be angelic accompaniments, etc., etc. All this, which superficially sounds like earnest inquiry, is but the old unbelief of Israel re-expressed. They wanted to know more than God had revealed about ‘the land’ which was their inheritance, and they wanted to know more than God had revealed as to ‘what way we must go up’. Both these questions were already answered to faith. God had ‘espied’ the land and had called it ‘good’. God went before them with fire and with cloud ‘to shew them by what way they should go’. Faith needs nothing more. 

[* - We were once asked by an American correspondent writing along these lines to ‘come down flat-footed’ as to the accompaniments and happenings associated with our hope.] 

If our inheritance is at the right hand of God, ‘far above all’, it is transcendentally above all human thought and experience, and what words of human language could describe the riches of the glory of that inheritance of the saints? If in the resurrection and translation we need adjusting to the new sphere of blessing ‘in the heavenly places’, how should we be the better if God described the process? It is enough for us that, as we receive a spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of ‘Him’, the ascended Lord, and the Mystery, we shall receive as full an answer to our quest for knowledge as God sees fit to give. If we are assured that ‘when Christ Who is our life shall be manifested, we also shall be manifested with Him in glory’ (Col. iii. 3), what does it matter if ‘the way we must go up’ is left unexplained? We shall arrive—praise God. We do not know how; all that is His responsibility, not ours. 

Our refusal to be turned back to I Thess. iv. as the hope of the Church is to be understood in the light of Numb. xiii. and xiv. We seek the spirit that enabled Caleb and Joshua to believe God, and leave the consequences. As we pointed out when dealing with Col. i. 23 (see Volume XXI), the great evidence of progress in the truth, or of the beginning of decline, is closely associated with holding stedfast to ‘the hope’. Caleb and Joshua were threatened with stoning for the stand they took. We shall probably get its equivalent again and again; but as in their case, so in ours, His truth shall be our shield and buckler. 

One of the reasons why the Lord was not too explicit about the land of Canaan and the way up, was because it was inhabited by a monstrous seed of the wicked one, the giants, the sons of Anak, and viewing such antagonists with the eyes of the flesh, the spies said: “We were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight” (Numb. xiii. 33). The cities were walled and very great, and grace was not given in the wilderness to deal with these remote difficulties. When at last Israel did stand before the walls of Jericho, they fell down flat at the shout of faith. 

The pathway to our inheritance is blocked by principalities and powers, spiritual wickedness and world-holders of darkness. If we should see them with the eyes of the flesh, we would crumple up as did Daniel (Dan. x. 9, 10). God mercifully spares us this vision. We believe His Word; that is enough. If we knew the formidable strongholds of Satan that must be overcome in ‘the evil day’, we would recoil in fear and unbelief. We shall not face them until we are all assembled beneath the banner of our true Captain, the greater Joshua, with Jordan behind us, and the land of promise immediately before us. Why not take a leaf out of this book of experience? Why not believe what God has revealed, and lovingly accept as best the fact that He withholds certain things? 

Before closing this article, let us record the encouraging words of faith given by Caleb: 

“And Caleb stilled the people before Moses, and said, Let us go up at once and possess it; for we are well able to overcome it” (Numb. xiii. 30). 

The word translated ‘stilled’ does not indicate that the people were calmed or comforted, the seven other occurrences of hasah suggest some element of authority, ‘Let all the earth keep silence before him’ (Hab. ii. 20). Men recognize the majesty of faith, even though they refuse to follow it. Caleb did not merely say ‘Let us go up’ or ‘Let us go up and possess it’, but “Let us go up AT ONCE and possess it”. While there is no adverb in the original to correspond with the words ‘at once’, there is an insistence that is very marked, for the Hebrew reads ‘going up, let us go up’, suggesting a prompt unhesitating obedience without delay and without dallying. 

“We are well able to overcome it.” These words in another context may indicate unholy and unwarranted self-confidence, but God is faithful to His promise, Who has gone before and Who calls upon us to follow. His commands are then His enablings. 

Again, after the dreadful desire to make a captain and return into Egypt, both Joshua and Caleb repeated their testimony and their exhortation saying “If the Lord delight in us, then He will bring us into this land and give it us: a land which floweth with milk and honey. Only rebel not ye against the Lord, neither fear ye the people of the land; for they are bread for us: their defence is departed from them, and the Lord is with us: fear them not” (Numb. xiv. 8, 9). 

Later the Psalmist said: 

“He brought me forth also into a large place: He delivered me, because He delighted in me” (Psa. xviii. 19). 

Caleb and Joshua stood firm upon the ground of grace. 

There are a number of key words that are used by Moses, Caleb, Joshua, Israel and the Prophets, the Psalmist and the Apostles afterwards that provide a solemn lesson as we think of helps and hindrances that we meet when we would ‘possess our possessions’. These we must consider together in another study. There is also the great revelation concerning the Amorites, the Canaanites and their spiritual equivalents to be pondered, and the contrast between the original plan to possess the land, and that which was subsequently followed. To these themes we must return and pray that increasing light may be given as we meditate upon these things that have been written for our learning. 

----------------

(From The Berean Expositor, vol. 41, page 187).
http://charleswelch.net/BE%20Vol%2041%20Final.pdf

----------------